The rise of micro-credentials in Australian higher education is the story of a sector learning to certify learning in units smaller than a degree, under a national definition that dates from November 2021, a permanent AQF qualification created in 2020 for the purpose, and a regulator that applies the full Threshold Standards to any credential a registered provider issues. For a private provider the opportunity is real, the regulatory position is clearer than it was five years ago, and the risks are almost entirely avoidable with the right design and governance.
This article is the overview piece for our micro-credential series. It covers definitions, the National Microcredentials Framework, the undergraduate certificate, the delivery models, how TEQSA regulates each, the state of the market, design and quality assurance, and where the field is heading, and it links to the more detailed articles where they exist. It draws on fifteen years of TEQSA registration and course accreditation work, including the accreditation of short-form qualifications since they first became available.
What a micro-credential is
The Australian definition is now settled. The National Microcredentials Framework, released by the Department of Education in November 2021, defines a micro-credential as a certification of assessed learning or competency, with a minimum volume of learning of one hour and less than an AQF award qualification, that is additional, alternate, complementary to or a component part of an AQF award qualification.
Three things in that definition matter for providers. It requires assessment, so a certificate of attendance is not a micro-credential. It sets the floor at one hour and the ceiling below an AQF award, so the term covers everything from a short compliance module to a semester-long unit. And it defines the credential by its relationship to AQF qualifications, which is what brings it within TEQSA's field of view for a registered provider.
The National Microcredentials Framework
The framework does more than define. It sets four unifying principles, that micro-credentials should be outcome-based, responsive to industry need, tailored to support lifelong learning, and transparent and accessible. It sets minimum information requirements that a provider should publish for each credential: title, provider, content, learning outcomes, delivery mode, volume of learning in hours, assessment method, certification, credit or recognition arrangements, quality assurance and prerequisites. And it describes how a micro-credential can be recognised for credit towards an AQF qualification, specified or unspecified, when an institution formally chooses to do so.
Two cautions are worth stating plainly. The framework is a policy document, not legislation; it does not bind a provider in the way the Threshold Standards do, and it does not itself accredit anything. And it does not create a separate regulatory category. A micro-credential offered by a TEQSA-registered provider is regulated because the provider is registered, and the framework simply describes what good practice looks like within that.
Download the Darlo Micro-credential Design Checklist
— a one-page test covering model, AQF level, assessment, representation and governance for any short-form credential, drawn from our TEQSA registration and accreditation work with private providers. Get the checklist
Want the full article?
Enter your email for free access to the rest of this guide and our TEQSA resource library.
Frequently asked questions
What is the official Australian definition of a micro-credential?
The National Microcredentials Framework of November 2021 defines it as a certification of assessed learning or competency, with a minimum volume of learning of one hour and less than an AQF award qualification, that is additional, alternate, complementary to or a component part of an AQF award qualification.
Is the undergraduate certificate a micro-credential?
Yes, and it is the only one that is also an AQF qualification. It is a half-year accredited award, now permanent, which means it goes through TEQSA course accreditation and can be described as accredited in a way non-award micro-credentials cannot.
Does TEQSA regulate non-award micro-credentials?
Yes, through the provider's registration. There is no micro-credential standard, but every course a registered provider offers is subject to the Threshold Standards, particularly on learning outcomes, assessment, academic board approval and accurate representation.
Can a micro-credential count as credit towards a degree?
Yes, if the receiving provider's credit policy under Standard 1.2 provides for it and the academic board has approved the mapping. The framework encourages providers to state credit arrangements in the credential's published information.
Dr Brendan Moloney is CEO of Darlo Higher Education, Australia's largest specialist TEQSA consultancy. He holds a PhD from the University of Melbourne, is a Cambridge University Press author on governance in higher education, and has advised private providers on registration and course accreditation for more than fifteen years.